General Principles
-
Colonization vs. True Infection
- Carefully distinguish between colonization and true infection to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use.
- True infections are common in vulnerable populations such as immunocompromised patients, individuals with pulmonary diseases, and those with hematological malignancies.
-
Preferred Approach
- Combination therapy is generally favored to enhance efficacy and prevent resistance, particularly in moderate to severe infections.
- Select agents with complementary mechanisms of action, considering in vitro activity, PK/PD properties, and clinical evidence.
First-Line Agents and Recommendations
-
Cefiderocol
- Role: Preferred agent in combination therapy.
- Rationale: Nearly 100% in vitro susceptibility, strong PK/PD data, and potent activity demonstrated in animal models.
- Limitation: Limited clinical data; use in combination therapy is recommended until clinical improvement.
-
Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Aztreonam
-
Minocycline (High Dose: 200mg q12h)
- Role: Option as part of combination therapy.
- Rationale: ~70-90% in vitro susceptibility (when using the previous CLSI breakpoint of ≤4 µg/mL, 2023年後改1µg/mL); better PK/PD and tolerability compared to other tetracycline derivatives.
- Limitation: Avoid in UTIs and use cautiously for bloodstream infections due to poor serum levels.
-
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX: 10-15mg/kg based on TMP)
- Role: Option as part of combination therapy.
- Rationale: >90% susceptibility; extensive clinical use history.
- Limitation: Only bacteriostatic against S. maltophilia; associated with significant adverse effects (e.g., hypersensitivity, nephrotoxicity).
-
Levofloxacin
- Role: Option as part of combination therapy.
- Rationale: Preferred fluoroquinolone with CLSI breakpoints; may offer marginal mortality benefits in some cases.
- Limitation: High MIC variability, emergence of resistance during therapy, and PK/PD limitations.
Agents Not Recommended
-
Ceftazidime
- Reason: Intrinsic resistance due to L1 and L2 β-lactamases. CLSI breakpoints no longer available.
-
Eravacycline and Omadacycline
- Reason: Limited in vitro activity against S. maltophilia; not supported by clinical data.
Dosing Recommendations
- Cefiderocol: Standard dosing based on clinical guidelines.
- Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Aztreonam: Administer based on established combination protocols.
- Minocycline: 200 mg IV every 12 hours for optimal PK/PD target attainment.
- TMP-SMX: 10-15 mg/kg/day (trimethoprim component) to balance efficacy and toxicity. Higher doses (>15 mg/kg/day of trimethoprim) are associated with increased toxicity without clear clinical benefit.
- Levofloxacin: 750 mg IV daily (adjust dose based on renal function).
Special Considerations
-
Monitoring
- Regularly monitor for adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity (e.g., with ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam), nephrotoxicity (e.g., TMP-SMX), and emergence of resistance (e.g., levofloxacin).
-
Infection Sites
- Avoid tetracyclines in UTIs due to poor urinary concentrations.
- Use combination therapy in bloodstream infections to improve outcomes.
-
Tailored Therapy
- Adjust based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results and patient-specific factors.
Conclusion
The management of S. maltophilia infections requires a nuanced approach that balances efficacy, resistance prevention, and adverse effect profiles. Combination therapy is generally preferred for moderate to severe infections, with cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam being the most reliable options. TMP-SMX, minocycline, and levofloxacin serve as alternative agents within combination regimens, depending on susceptibility, site of infection, and patient tolerance.
沒有留言:
張貼留言